Donn Zaretsky has a good analysis on the motion to dismiss here, arguing strongly that donors, in this case the Rose family, have little if any standing.
"Time and again, Massachusetts courts and the Legislature have rejected the notion that donors or their heirs have standing ... to enforce their vision of how a charitable organization should operate. The authority to supervise charities in this way is reserved exclusively to the Attorney General."
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/418b5/418b5ac862eb924141daffd8315c67ce3d7aaf73" alt="Share/Save/Bookmark"
No comments:
Post a Comment