tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-7575323233407462974.post2308057625733014103..comments2023-10-30T05:10:31.292-04:00Comments on The Deaccessioning Blog: Chicago Weighs in on Deaccessioning BattleSergio Muñoz Sarmientohttp://www.blogger.com/profile/18365215427617702363noreply@blogger.comBlogger3125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-7575323233407462974.post-61688470816083166752009-07-11T17:13:11.807-04:002009-07-11T17:13:11.807-04:00Dawoud,
My apologies for such a belated reply. I...Dawoud, <br /><br />My apologies for such a belated reply. I will indeed reply to your posts and look at the "CoAccessioning" concept. <br /><br />'til soon, <br />smsSergio Muñoz Sarmientohttps://www.blogger.com/profile/18365215427617702363noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-7575323233407462974.post-53466567892335756112009-07-09T09:14:25.237-04:002009-07-09T09:14:25.237-04:00If you are still following the Art Talk Chicago bl...If you are still following the Art Talk Chicago blog, I wonder what you think about the CoAccessioning concept. It seems to offer a balanced solution: the museum keeps the work on view for the public while also reaping the financial benefits of selling a stake in the work. <br /><br />Here is art consultant Paul Klein's definition of the term: "CoAccession: to divide various ownership rights (like possession, financial interest and/or curatorial interest, etc.) This is new and has not been done yet, but appears to be a legal and a likely possibility."Dawoud Beynoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-7575323233407462974.post-4017860503972626142009-07-07T21:57:41.915-04:002009-07-07T21:57:41.915-04:00It's not that I personally find it "dubio...It's not that I personally find it "dubious" so much as the museum field itself has not yet been conclusive on this issue. What make it dubious is that there is no consensus within the field itself. <br /><br />I myself am beginning to believe that something is going to have to give.Dawoud Beyhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/17536346991511470491noreply@blogger.com